ordonpumpkin:
Ah, yes, that’s true, about general dubiousness; the brain-washing seems kind of like an exception to me, because they’re made out to be on the same level as Ganon in terms of evilness; they’re unsympathetic characters whose intentions are pretty clear as just being selfishly out for ruling the world (or at least supporting Ganon to do it).
Possible trigger warnings below for discussion of dub-con situations!
So maybe I just mean dubious sexual consent? I don’t want to imply the Gerudo are sunshine and kittens, but I think they’re anti-heroes more than villains. They have a very Catwoman-like set of morals; sex and sexuality are no problem for them, going by their flirtatious manner of speaking to Link, and the revealing tops despite the harsh desert sun. So I think it feels very strange for them to resort to something like dub-con sexual relations for the sake of procreation. Even if they seem to have a kind of bitterness towards outsiders, I think it’s more of a response to the King of Hyrule denying them any land and resources from the much more plentiful lands outside of the desert. Once Link is given the pass to travel around the camp by the second-in-command, the Gerudo open up and speak to him like he’s one of their own; Nabooru has no qualms about treating Link like he’s a good guy. So even if there’s a bit of nationalism/xenophobia between the Gerudo and Hylians, using fellows sexually seems to be against their characterization.
Especially since they are relatively sexually liberated in the context of the game! Using fellows for babies, not having any mention of lasting relationships, showing off a lot of skin (again, compared to the Hylian ladies, who are covered neck-to-ankle), flirting shamelessly, and probably having a lot of situational lesbianism (taken from real life scenarios of all-women’s groups, and the context of the game showing no gentlemen around the camp!)—these things all add up for me to ladies who understand the idea of sex for pleasure, and the idea of consensual sex for pleasure, so even the initial distrust of Hylians doesn’t seem enough to push them over into that kind of behavior culturally. In fact, for them, being fairly feminist in their behavior, I would go so far as to say they would abhor that kind of thing in a widespread way!
Ganon, of course, might be a different case. Since he was raised more by the witch sisters, that kind of cultural “training” might not have been a part of his life. It would be an incredibly lazy narrative move to make “sexual predator” a part of his characterization, but it doesn’t strike me as totally impossible. It even fits pretty nicely into his role as holder of the Triforce of Power, but maybe I’m just being biased about not wanting that kind of thing in the media, you know?
Also! I hope you don’t think I’m trying to fuss or argue! I just generally have a lot of feelings about Zelda, and I really like these kinds of discussions. So I followed you because wow dang what a perfect blog.
Trying to keep this from being too tl;dr by cutting out all but the previous reply!
First of all, I don’t mind discussion in the least. So please don’t think I consider it an undue ‘fuss’ or ‘arguement’. I, too, have a lot of feelings about Zelda and is why I started the blog. Getting my thoughts in order takes time so I haven’t updated the Kokiri stuff yet despite having replayed the area a dozen times just to write down all the dialouge I can.
Getting back to the discussion at hand…
Continued Trigger Warnings for discussion of Dubious Consent
I actually don’t think they would ‘use’ or think to force Link once he joins them. At that point he is no longer an outsider, he’s one of them. I apologize if I implied that in any way. I think he was at risk up until the point he got a membership card. Once that was over with, he was one of the Gerudo, a ‘sister’ of the tribe, if you will. At that point he would be given all the same consideration as any other member.
I also agree that all signs point to sexual liberation on a scale that isn’t seen elsewhere in the worldset. They are proud of their bodies and not afraid to show it. (They may also have developed a more natural immunity or adaptation to the effects of the sun that allows them to walk around with less covering than others would need).
I don’t, however, believe that sexual liberation means they are less likely to use coercion in the needs of procreation. Sexual pleasure is one thing, propagating the species is another entirely. Finding boyfriends doesn’t have to mean “looking to get pregnant”, it could just mean they’re looking for male companionship on the same level as they’re able to get from their fellow women in the tribe and unfortunately cannot find there due to their low male birth rate.
As far as social taboos go, due to the xenophobia displayed by Hyrule’s Government, and based on how forcefully and swift they imprison tresspassers, I don’t believe there would be many who would frown on issues of dubious consent toward outsiders. There is likely to be something against full out rape (which for the sake of this discussion I will define as obviously non-con without any level of dub-con because that can get tricky fast), but convincing a prisoner to sleep with them at some point before their fate is decided - and without any false stipulations as to how this might effect their sentence - would not be beyond a few of them, IMO. More so amongst those who live on the border than those who live further into the desert because the effective racism/class-ism/etc between countries and peoples would be more pronounced.
It is obvious, I think, that the Gerudo do try not to let it get to the point of such dubious consent with their prospective baby-daddy’s because of how the Carpenters ran off looking to join them. It’s very likely that the Hyrule Government has done a lot of anti-Gerudo propaganda in living memory (10-17 years after the unification war is not enough time to have that forgotten even if they did eventually bow) so the Gerudo had to have been doing something to make their way of life and the prospect of joining them tempting enough for people to run away to do so. But with how poorly they’re treated by the government of Hyrule, I find it more likely that when it comes down to trying to get pregnant, they will not hesitate to grab men and do their damnedest to get him to say ‘sure’. As with all things, the man in question would determine how easy or not it would be to do so.
All that said, that kind of pressing need is not likely to come up often. The Gerudo are both nomadic and very long lived. Their birth rates would probably be very low already and the need for more members of the tribe via birth would only be pressing during extended periods of war or just after. Otherwise, they can be pretty relaxed in building relationships in their travels with a possible goal of having a baby from it.
Ocarina of Time being within that time frame of War/Shortly After, the likely hood of the Carpenters and Link being held for ‘convincing’ is very high. I am not trying to say that they would have forced themselves on the prisoners, because they obviously didn’t care enough about the Carpenters running away once released, but coercion was likely to be attempted before they chose to release the prisoners and let them go on their own.
As far as preferences in entertainment media, I like mine with a bit of edge so reading dub-con and even non-con into how a society interacts with another is not something I mind doing. I don’t think it makes the society as a whole a ‘villain’. In terms of my original answer, I didn’t mean to imply dub-con/non-con as a way of life, just a possibility that people overlook when discussing how the Gerudo propagate.